Nicolas Gabard has been cutting men's suits in a quiet courtyard off the Rue de Richelieu since 2012. He did not set out to dress women. The women, it turns out, simply started arriving.
The story of menswear-as-womenswear is older than most of the names usually attached to it. Coco Chanel borrowed her lover's blazer in the 1920s and kept it. Yves Saint Laurent put Le Smoking on a Paris runway in 1966 and made the suit a permanent option in a woman's wardrobe. From Marlene Dietrich's white-tie evening to Bianca Jagger's wedding suit on the steps of the Mairie du 1er, the gesture has always been the same. A woman puts on a man's clothing, and the room shifts.
Husbands Paris is the latest house to find itself in the middle of that gesture, almost by accident. Founded by Gabard at the age of thirty-three, the brand began as a shop for men who wanted a particular kind of suit, cut with a particular kind of conviction, in a city that had largely stopped offering either. Nearly fourteen years on, half the customers crossing its threshold are women.
The education of a tailor
Gabard moved to Paris in the nineteen-nineties, into a city still under the spell of designers who had decided that fashion was, primarily, a discipline. Dries Van Noten was building a brand without advertising. Helmut Lang treated his campaigns like conceptual art. Costume National and Jil Sander made suits that looked architectural before architecture became a fashion adjective. Martin Margiela communicated with editors by fax. Each of them, in different ways, suggested that a designer could be present in the work and absent everywhere else.
The turning point arrived in 2000, when Hedi Slimane took over Dior Homme and began cutting menswear at the proportions of his own body, a body which happened to resemble Gabard's. The young men of Paris suddenly had a silhouette of their own. Gabard spent his salary on bespoke suits, then his savings, then, eventually, his time. By the time Husbands opened, he had spent more than a decade learning to read a sleeve the way an editor reads a page.
The cinema of the cut
The Husbands aesthetic is openly cinematic. Mick Jagger circa 1972, Lou Reed on the cover of Transformer, the photographs that came out of Studio 54 before the camera became a phone. Gabard is fluent in these references and does not pretend otherwise. The shop sells single-breasted jackets with a sharply notched lapel, double-breasted blazers cut close to the ribs, high-rise trousers that taper at the ankle, oxford shirts with collars stiff enough to stand up on their own. A pair of Cuban-heeled boots will follow you out the door if you let them.
What separates the house from the dozens of others mining the same era is the rigour underneath the romance. A Husbands suit is genuinely bespoke. Cloth is chosen in the back of the shop, body is measured under a daylight bulb, and an hour can be spent on the placement of a single button. Gabard talks about the shoulder the way some chefs talk about salt. Everything else, he says, is downstream of getting it right.
The women arrive
The female clientele announced itself slowly. An editor would come in with a husband and leave with measurements of her own. A stylist would borrow a tweed blazer for a shoot and call back asking if she could buy it. A fashion director from Milan would order a tuxedo for the Venice Film Festival and quietly recommend the shop to half her contacts list. Within a few years, the brand had a steady current of women threading through it, most of them ordering the same garments the men did, with the same fittings, in the same fabrics.
The women never asked Husbands to design for them. They asked it to keep doing what it already did and to cut the garment to their body. Daisy Shaw-Ellis, accessories director at Vanity Fair, found her way in through years of working with the brand on shoots; she now keeps the oxford shirt she should have bought during her last fitting on a kind of mental tab. Alexis Wolfe, executive fashion director at Elle, settled on a navy and a black, both in heavy wool, both cut close on top and looser through the leg. Karla Martinez at Vogue Latin America describes the brand as feeling more insider than its peers, a quality she defines, neatly, as not quiet luxury but something cooler and more understated.
A woman puts on a man's clothing, and the room shifts. Husbands has simply made itself the room.
Sienna CaldwellThe headless campaign
The brand's most identifiable formal device is also its most discreet. Husbands' campaigns crop the model's head out of every image. A jacket, a hand, a collar, a knee, but no face. Gabard describes the choice as a refusal of fiction. The brand will not place its clothes on a boat in Capri or in front of a vintage Mercedes and call that a story. The story, in this house, is the customer. The model's job is to disappear by the time the customer arrives.
That philosophy, dressed up, would feel pretentious in most rooms. In Husbands' it reads as practical. The shop is small enough that the people working in it can tell you, by name, which client wears which fabric, and which jacket was made in which year. A campaign is just a placeholder for the eventual fitting. The fitting is the brand.
The future, withheld
Gabard has resisted the obvious move. Demand has been building for smaller sizes and silhouettes designed explicitly for women, and a "Wives" line has been suggested by enough people that one assumes it has been quietly sketched and quietly shelved. He keeps declining. The women who come to Husbands, he argues, come because the clothes were not made for them. A jacket cut for a man's shoulder, fitted to a woman's body, is a different garment than a jacket designed from the outset for a woman. The first is a transaction. The second is a translation.
It is the more interesting position, and very probably the more profitable one, even if Gabard would never frame it that way. The Husbands female customer is part of the brand's mythology now. She walks into a menswear shop, leaves with menswear, and turns it into her own wardrobe through the small, accumulating decisions a tailor's house enables. Le Smoking lives on, but quieter, behind an unmarked door near the Palais-Royal. The shoulder is the same. The room has shifted.